[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] Bridge interface and script
- From: John Levon <levon movementarian org>
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] Bridge interface and script
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:09:32 +0000
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:54:58AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > With current libvirt, it's not possible to specify a script for
> > VIR_DOMAIN_NET_TYPE_BRIDGE. Is this just an oversight, or intentional?
>
> That's intentional - if you want to use a generic network script then
> use the type=ethernet style of network config instead of type=bridge
OK, why? Is there a reason for this restriction?
> > Suggestions on how to fix this? Should I just add script handling to
> > this net type?
>
> If the Solaris VIF setup script isn't called 'vif-bridge', then we can
> just #ifdef the alternate name required for Solaris & everything else
> should just work
Nope, since we have at least two standard scripts that are usable. Also,
this is a back-compat issue (presumably, even for Linux...) that I don't
think we can avoid.
regards
john
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]