[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] RFC: configuring host interfaces with libvirt
- From: Chris Hoy Poy <kryanth gopc net>
- To: John Levon <levon movementarian org>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] RFC: configuring host interfaces with libvirt
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:46:08 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Hi all,
I think I agree with David here
I think that some method of configuring host network interfaces is inline with configuring CPU or RAM allocations for a guest.
You want to provision say, a new server, you might want to add a tagged VLAN bridge for it to sit off as well. Or perhaps establish a private "bridge" or subnet for it.
At the moment, you have to set that up manually. While it can be easily standardized ( I think ) - there are some complexities ( ie MTU settings - jumbo frames, or allowing for tagged vlan overhead without appropriate hardware.. ).
Am I inline with your thinkings, David? ;)
cheers;
//Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Levon" <levon movementarian org>
To: "David Lutterkort" <lutter redhat com>
Cc: libvir-list redhat com
Sent: Friday, 16 January, 2009 12:29:43 PM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing / Hong Kong / Urumqi
Subject: Re: [libvirt] RFC: configuring host interfaces with libvirt
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 02:59:17AM +0000, David Lutterkort wrote:
> I am not disagreeing with you, but either way, libvirt needs _some_ way
> to control host interfaces.
This is far from obvious to me. Could you explain more?
regards
john
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]