[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[libvirt] KVM processes -- should we be able to attach them to the libvirtd process?
- From: "Hugh O. Brock" <hbrock redhat com>
- To: libvir-list redhat com
- Cc: mattf redhat com
- Subject: [libvirt] KVM processes -- should we be able to attach them to the libvirtd process?
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:13:38 -0400
Not too long ago we took a patch that allowed QEMU VMs to keep running
even if libvirtd died or was restarted.
I was talking to Matt Farellee (cc'd) this afternoon about
manageability, and he feels fairly strongly that this behavior should be
optional -- in other words, it should be possible to guarantee that if
libvirtd dies, it will take all the VMs with the "die-with-libvirtd"
flag set down with it.
I'm not sure this API is portable to Xen, but it would work on any
hypervisor that represents the VM as a normal process.
Does this strike anyone else as useful behavior?
Thanks,
--Hugh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]