[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] stat() vs. access()
- From: Maximilian Wilhelm <max rfc2324 org>
- To: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] stat() vs. access()
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:01:30 +0100
Anno domini 2009 Daniel P. Berrange scripsit:
> > While discussing some code with Matthias, we stumbled across many occurances
> > of stat() calls within the libVirt code (virFileExists() for example) which
> > could be implemented in a cheaper way when using access() instead of stat(),
> > when the only purpose is to check for the existance of a file.
> > The one thing I'm concerned about, is the question if access() does the right
> > thing in all situations. As the manpages didn't tell anything about
> > directories it might be worth to clarify this in advance.
> > A simple practical test showed that
> > access ("/path/to/dir", F_OK)
> > seems to work as expected.
> > Any comments on these (optimization) thoughs?
> I don't see any problems with this idea, so if you want to do the conversion
> go for it.
Ok, I will have a look at this when I have a bit time these days.
Ciao
Max
--
Lauf nicht vor Deinem Glück davon:
Es könnte hinter Dir stehen!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]