[libvirt] [PATCH] network: bridge: Don't start network if it collides with host routing

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Mon May 24 10:16:36 UTC 2010


On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:34AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/21/2010 09:28 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >> Any interest in doing this with netlink instead? (I've got this "thing" 
> >> against parsing text files to get information if it can be retrieved via 
> >> a nice clean API). If so, I think I can whip up the equivalent code with 
> >> libnl calls, but probably not until later in the afternoon.
> >>
> >> If I'm the only one who feels uneasy about parsing stuff out of /proc, 
> >> then I'm fine with that too.
> >>
> > 
> > My feeling is it depends on what else libnl buys us. A library
> > dependency for a single safety check doesn't seem worth it. If we use
> > the lib, we definitely don't want it to be optional, as debugging
> > network issues in the future shouldn't require asking 'is libvirt
> > compiled against libnl'.
> 
> Stefan just posted a patch series that would also add a dependency on
> libnl for vepa; as long as we are using the library, we might as well
> use it for more than one thing.

We already depend on it via netcf in any case.


Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London    -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org        -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list