Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] live snapshot wiki updated

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha gmail com>]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berrange redhat com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>> The 20/07/11, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> > To make the decision whether the filename from QEMU is valid, we have
>> > to parse the master image header data to see if the filename actually
>> > matches the backing file required by the image assigned to the guest.
>>
>> Actually, libvirt should not have to worry if the filename provided by
>> QEMU is valid. I think it should trust QEMU. If QEMU doesn't provide
>> information others can trust; it should be fixed at QEMU side.
>
> The security goal of libvirt is to protect the host from a compromised
> QEMU, therefore QEMU is, by definition, untrusted.

This is a very reasonable goal.  QEMU is constantly dealing with the
untrusted guest.  The whole point of SELinux isolation of QEMU is to
contain any compromise to a single VM and reduce the capabilities of
that process to the minimum.

libvirt needs to help set the boundaries of what the QEMU process can do.

Stefan