[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RESEND RFC v4 5/6] qemu: Implement cfs_period and cfs_quota's modification
- From: Wen Congyang <wency cn fujitsu com>
- To: Adam Litke <agl us ibm com>, libvirt <libvir-list redhat com>, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>, "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj linux vnet ibm com>, Izumi Taku <izumi taku jp fujitsu com>
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RESEND RFC v4 5/6] qemu: Implement cfs_period and cfs_quota's modification
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:35:23 +0800
At 07/21/2011 09:00 PM, Adam Litke Write:
>
>
> On 07/20/2011 09:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> +static int
>> +qemuGetVcpusBWLive(virDomainObjPtr vm, virCgroupPtr cgroup,
>> + unsigned long long *period, long long *quota)
>> +{
>> + virCgroupPtr cgroup_vcpu = NULL;
>> + qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = NULL;
>> + int rc;
>> + int ret = -1;
>> +
>> + priv = vm->privateData;
>> + if (priv->nvcpupids == 0 || priv->vcpupids[0] == vm->pid) {
>> + /* We do not create sub dir for each vcpu */
>> + rc = qemuGetVcpuBWLive(cgroup, period, quota);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> + if (*quota > 0)
>> + *quota /= vm->def->vcpus;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> Are you sure the above is correct? Based on my earlier suggestion,
> <quota> is always specified as the amount of runtime afforded to a
> single vcpu. Hence, if you are changing quota to cover for all of a
> vm's vcpus, wouldn't you want to:
>
> *quota *= vm->def->vcpus;
When we set, we use '*quota *= vm->def->vcpus;',
so when we read, we should use '*quota /= vm->def->vcpus'
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> ?
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]