[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] Parallels Server Bare Metal driver stub
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: Dmitry Mishin <dim parallels com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] [RFC] Parallels Server Bare Metal driver stub
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:36:47 +0100
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:21:05PM +0400, Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 06:10:19 PM Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > Any pointers ? All I found was
> > > > http://www.parallels.com/ptn/download/sdk/
> > > >
> > > > and it's quite silent on code availability and Licence for the
> > > > libraries.
> > >
> > > It has a proprietary license and not open sourced now. Is it a problem?
> >
> > If the license is not LGPLv2+ compatible, then it can't be used
> > by libvirt, regardless of whether it is directly linked, or
> > dlopened. In other words using 'dlopen' doesn't magically solve
> > the license compatibility problem.
> Will we solve the issue if libvirt will be statically linked with SDK library
> (as Daniel requests) and SDK library itself will be distributed in binary form
> under BSD license conditions (which is LGPLv2 compatible)?
Yes, linking to a BSD licensed library is fine from a licensing point
of view.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]