[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-gconfig PATCHv2 14/14] Implement gvir_config_domain_setup_default_usb_controllers
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre lureau gmail com>
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com, Hans de Goede <hdegoede redhat com>, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [libvirt-gconfig PATCHv2 14/14] Implement gvir_config_domain_setup_default_usb_controllers
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:19:33 +0100
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> > What would _USB2 do? Add an _EHCI controller, plus either
> > _PIIX3_UHCI or _PIIX4_UHCI?
>
> >From what I remember Hans told me, all the 4 ehci + uhci companions
> controllers are needed for a proper USB2 setup.
>
> I suggest an enum value such as
> CONFIG_DOMAIN_SETUP_USB_CONTROLLERS_USB2 for default USB2 setup (using
> the ICH9 controllers, but could be changed someday perhaps)
When we get into such discussions, I question whether the API is
appropriate for libvirt-gconfig. This API should be focusing on
the mechanism for creating guest configs & trying to avoid policy
based questions, which can be left upto higher level apps/APIs.
The concept of 'default usb controllers' seems very policy based
to me & different hypervisors will have different views of this.
So IMHO we should not add this API
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]