Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv5 04/23] blockjob: add new API flags

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini redhat com>]

Il 18/04/2012 16:18, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
> However, the question is whether we feel comfortable enough with pushing this
> with the risk that qemu implementation is not upstream yet. I think the API is
> sane but the history of pushing something that qemu ended up implementing in a
> different way worries me a bit.

FWIW, the worries on the QEMU side aren't really with the API but with
the implementation.  We are not sure of the drive-reopen API, but the
mirroring abstractions (apart from transactions, i.e. patches 19-23)
should be fine.

Paolo