[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] correct security_require_confined default value
- From: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar redhat com>
- To: ajia redhat com
- Cc: libvir-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] correct security_require_confined default value
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:50 +0100
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 18:38:24 +0800, ajia redhat com wrote:
> From: Alex Jia <ajia redhat com>
>
> * src/qemu/qemu.conf: set security_require_confined default value to 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <ajia redhat com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu.conf | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu.conf b/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> index 95428c1..6cb3707 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
>
> # If set to non-zero, then attempts to create unconfined
> # guests will be blocked. Defaults to 0.
> -# security_require_confined = 1
> +# security_require_confined = 0
This is just a comment explaining how to set the value, I don't think we have
any rule saying the values in comment are the default ones. The comment about
is explicit about what the default value is.
> # The user ID for QEMU processes run by the system instance.
> #user = "root"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For example, the value above is usually not the default one either.
That said, this patch is not doing anything wrong but I think that if we want
to do this, we should document the rule and fix all values at once to be
consistent with it. And I don't think it's worth it.
Jirka
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]