[libvirt] [PATCH] libvirt: fix comment typo

Alex Jia ajia at redhat.com
Fri Mar 16 09:58:21 UTC 2012


On 03/16/2012 06:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 05:51 PM, Alex Jia wrote:
>> * src/libvirt.c (virStorageVolResize): correct comment typo according to
>>    virStorageVolResizeFlags enum define.
>
> s/define/definition/
Oh, yup. Thanks and pushed with this change now.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<ajia at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   src/libvirt.c |    6 +++---
>>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/libvirt.c b/src/libvirt.c
>> index d0b1b28..7f8d42c 100644
>> --- a/src/libvirt.c
>> +++ b/src/libvirt.c
>> @@ -13324,15 +13324,15 @@ error:
>>    * capacity; this may make the operation take noticeably longer.
>>    *
>>    * Normally, the operation treats @capacity as the new size in bytes;
>> - * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_DELTA, then @capacity
>> + * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_DELTA, then @capacity
>>    * represents the size difference to add to the current size.  It is
>>    * up to the storage pool implementation whether unaligned requests 
>> are
>>    * rounded up to the next valid boundary, or rejected.
>>    *
>>    * Normally, this operation should only be used to enlarge capacity;
>> - * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_SHRINK, it is possible to
>> + * but if @flags contains VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_SHRINK, it is 
>> possible to
>>    * attempt a reduction in capacity even though it might cause data 
>> loss.
>> - * If VIR_STORAGE_RESIZE_DELTA is also present, then @capacity is
>> + * If VIR_STORAGE_VOL_RESIZE_DELTA is also present, then @capacity is
>>    * subtracted from the current size; without it, @capacity represents
>>    * the absolute new size regardless of whether it is larger or smaller
>>    * than the current size.
>
> ACK with commit msg fixed.
>
> Osier




More information about the libvir-list mailing list