[Linux-cachefs] Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]

[David Howells <dhowells redhat com>]

James Morris <jmorris namei org> wrote:

> > +	u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
> 
> To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an 
> error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.

Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
return an error?

David