[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Linux-cluster] Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb suse de>
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, Al Viro <viro parcelfarce linux theplanet co uk>, linux-cluster redhat com, akpm osdl org, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:05:11 +0100
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:02:59PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> What would a syntax look like which in your opinion does not remove
> totally valid symlink targets for magic mushroom bullshit? Prefix with
> // (which, according to POSIX, allows for implementation-defined
> behaviour)? Something else, not allowed in a regular pathname?
None. just don't do it. Use bindmount, they're cheap and have sane
defined semtantics.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]