[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Linux-cluster] Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan infradead org>
- To: David Teigland <teigland redhat com>
- Cc: akpm osdl org, linux-cluster redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:55:49 +0200
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 14:06 +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:45:24AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > * + if (create)
> > + down_write(&ip->i_rw_mutex);
> > + else
> > + down_read(&ip->i_rw_mutex);
> >
> > why do you use a rwsem and not a regular semaphore? You are aware that
> > rwsems are far more expensive than regular ones right? How skewed is
> > the read/write ratio?
>
> Rough tests show around 4/1, that high or low?
that's quite borderline; if it was my code I'd not use a rwsem for that
ratio (my own rule of thumb, based on not a lot other than gut feeling)
is a 10/1 ratio at minimum... but it's not so low that it screams for
removing it. However.... it might well make your code a lot simpler so
it might still be worth simplifying.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]