[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
- From: Mark Fasheh <mark fasheh oracle com>
- To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg cs helsinki fi>
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg gmail com>, akpm osdl org, linux-cluster redhat com, Zach Brown <zab zabbo net>, linux-kernel vger kernel org
- Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:07:44 -0700
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:18:48PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Aah, I see GFS2 does that too so no deadlocks here. Thanks.
Yep, no problem :)
> You, however, don't maintain the same level of data consistency when reads
> and writes are from other filesystems as they use ->nopage.
I'm not sure what you mean here...
> Fixing this requires a generic vma walk in every write() and read(), no?
> That doesn't seem such an hot idea which brings us back to using ->nopage
> for taking the locks (but now the deadlocks are back).
Yeah if you look through mmap.c in ocfs2_fill_ctxt_from_buf() we do this...
Or am I misunderstanding what you mean?
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark fasheh oracle com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]