[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>
- To: Zach Brown <zab zabbo net>
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch infradead org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg gmail com>, Pekka J Enberg <penberg cs Helsinki FI>, akpm osdl org, linux-cluster redhat com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, Andreas Dilger <adilger clusterfs com>
- Subject: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:35:41 +0100
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:33:41AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> ordering when multiple file systems are concerned. It doesn't record
> the ranges of the mappings involved so Lustre can't properly use its
> range locks.
That doesn't matter. Please don't put in any effort for lustre special
cases - they are unwilling to cooperate and they'll get what they deserve.
> And finally, it doesn't prohibit mapping operations for
> the duration of the IO -- the whole reason we ended up in this thread in
> the first place :)
>
> Christoph, would you be interested in looking at a more thorough patch
> if I threw one together?
Sure, I'm not sure that'll happen in a timely fashion, though.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]