Re: [Linux-cluster] Fencing Problems

[Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie redhat com>]

Andrew Forgue wrote:
> Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> 
> 
>>Data integrity requires that the remaining node knows for sure that the other
>>node has been removed from the cluster. Without that assurance your data is toast.
>>
> 
> 
> Would this be possible if GFS implemented an on-disk quota system?
> 

GFS does have quotas but I don't see what they have to do with fencing. If you
meant a "quorum disk" then the answer is "yes". But we don't have a quorum disk
facility.

-- 

patrick