[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Linux-cluster] NFS configuration question
- From: Lon Hohberger <lhh redhat com>
- To: linux clustering <linux-cluster redhat com>
- Cc: Birger Wathne ift uib no
- Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] NFS configuration question
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:48:16 -0400
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 16:40 -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> > Perhaps a better way would be to make a copy of the struct for the
> > shared resource_t any time it's referenced, rather than just using the
> > same one for all resource_node_t. I'm willing to write up this patch if
> > you think it's a better course of action.
>
> Both work.
>
> For now, I think we should use this, as copying an entire resource_t
> structure has the downside of complicating reconfiguration, which is
> already rather ... complicated :)
>
> Ideally, we'd just have private "last-check-time" and "last-check-level"
> in the resource node structure and not put it in the resource action
> structures. This would require a little more work.
Birger -- can you apply that patch and let me know if it works for you?
If so, can I convince one of you to file a bugzilla against rgmanager
for tracking? :)
-- Lon
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]