Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS or ???

[Jonathan E Brassow <jbrassow redhat com>]

GFS is primarily used in active/active setups.  You may be able to get 
by with rgmanager if you are using active/passive, but I'll let someone 
who knows more talk about that.

 brassow

On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:45 PM, DJ-Kast . wrote:

> Hi,
>
>   I am looking for advice on a configuration for a portal I am setting 
> up.
>
> I will have 3 Load Balanced BSD web servers that will be using a SAN 
> for storage
>
> I will have 2 clustered Redhat boxes, 1 active and 1 passive connected 
> to the SAN.
> The SAN will be connected via iSCSI to the 2 Redhat boxes
>
> Do I need to use GFS to mount the drives?
>
> I am skeptical about doing the GFS->NFS export, as I've seen lots of 
> posts of people
> having problems.  Can this extra step be eliminated by something more 
> efficient for
> the setup I require?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> -Paul
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster