[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS RG size (and tuning)
- From: Josh Gray <jgray nicusa com>
- To: linux clustering <linux-cluster redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS RG size (and tuning)
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:13:59 -0400
Yea larger - sorry larger I meant
<snip>
Yes, it is definitely possible that using a bigger resource group may help
with performance. Since this is not yet in production, I would urge you to
do some testing now while you can and compare results from the default size
of 256 versus a setting of around 2048.
</snip>
On 10/27/07 2:21 PM, "Jos Vos" <jos xos nl> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:15:33PM -0400, Josh Gray wrote:
>
>> Support said i would probably expect significant improvement with
>> more RG's but we went with the other file format before we tried that.
>
> You mean *less* (and larger) RGs I presume?
--
Josh Gray
Systems Administrator
NIC Inc
Email: jgray nicusa com
Desk/Mobile: 913-221-1520
"It is not the mountain we conquer, but ourselves."
- Sir Edmund Hillary
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]