[Linux-cluster] What is the order of processing a lock request?
Christine Caulfield
ccaulfie at redhat.com
Wed May 14 09:04:13 UTC 2008
Ja S wrote:
>>>> If the node doesn't have a local lock on
>>>> the resource then it
>>>> doesn't "know" it and has to ask the directory
>>>> node where it is mastered.
>
>>> Does it mean even if the node owns the master lock
>>> resource but it doesn't have a local lock
>>> associated with the master lock resource, it
>>> still needs to ask the directory node?
>
>
>> hash tables, hash tables, hash tables ;-)
>
> Sure. Now I see what do you mean "knows". Thanks.
>
> Could you please kindly answer my last question above?
The answer is "No" ... because it's in the resource hash table.
... see, I told you it was all hash tables ...
Chrissie
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list