I'm running 2.2.10+lvm 0.7 on a dual PIII-450/512MB server. It's operating stabily as an ftp and http server for distribution of Debian and Linux kernel. I run about 750Kbps continual bandwidth 24x7. I have used lvm since i upgraded the server a few weeks ago. No problems detected at all so far... Brian Wolfe TerraBox.Com On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:24:15AM -0400, mmclinn cdt com wrote: > > > Hello, > > First off, I'm a big supporter of LVM, I use it on a 56gig array at home > regularly without any problems and I can't wait to see it migrate into > the stable kernel tree. > > I do have a couple of questions for people with more experience than > I... > > I am currently preparing to setup a new main file server for my company. > It will be linux based, and will store approximately 25 gigs of data > that > will be used constantly. LVM would be _really_ useful on this machine. > > I'm wondering peoples opinions about whether or not LVM is ready to be > used in > a business environment. In other words, how stable has this code been > for people? > I have run into no problems, but I have been using it informally thus > far. > > Also, I am wondering whether or not future versions of LVM will always > be compatible with the current implementation? Will there ever be a > point when I would need to > reinstall my LVM volumes to upgrade to the latest version of LVM? > > Any opinions, thoughts, cautions, advice, ect.. would be much > appreciated. > > Thanks all! > > > -Michael McLinn
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature