[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM Question



	I'm running 2.2.10+lvm 0.7 on a dual PIII-450/512MB server. It's operating stabily as an ftp and http server for distribution of Debian and Linux kernel. I run about 750Kbps continual bandwidth 24x7. I have used lvm since i upgraded the server a few weeks ago.

	No problems detected at all so far...

	Brian Wolfe
	TerraBox.Com

On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:24:15AM -0400, mmclinn cdt com wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> First off, I'm a big supporter of LVM, I use it on a 56gig array at home
> regularly without any problems and I can't wait to see it migrate into
> the stable kernel tree.
> 
> I do have a couple of questions for people with more experience than
> I...
> 
> I am currently preparing to setup a new main file server for my company.
> It will be linux based, and will store approximately 25 gigs of data
> that
> will be used constantly.  LVM would be _really_ useful on this machine. 
> 
> I'm wondering peoples opinions about whether or not LVM is ready to be
> used in
> a business environment.  In other words, how stable has this code been
> for people?
> I have run into no problems, but I have been using it informally thus
> far.
> 
> Also, I am wondering whether or not future versions of LVM will always
> be compatible with the current implementation?  Will there ever be a
> point when I would need to
> reinstall my LVM volumes to upgrade to the latest version of LVM?
> 
> Any opinions, thoughts, cautions, advice, ect.. would be much
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks all!
> 
> 
> -Michael McLinn

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]