[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[linux-lvm] RE: LVM 2.2.16



Yes, I modified ll_rw_block.c to make it compile (not too difficult tought
I'm not a kernel specialist.
Then everything works except that I have strange locks when doing LVM + raid
hot-swap!

Here is the ll_rw_block.c file. Hope it will work for you.
If it works, could you please make and distribute a raid+LVM for 2.2.16
patch?

Thanks
-jec

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Mehrmann [mailto:daniel mehrmann ping-net de]
> Sent: mercredi, 9. août 2000 21:16
> To: Jean-Eric Cuendet
> Subject: Re: LVM 2.2.16
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jean-Eric Cuendet <Jean-Eric Cuendet linkvest com>
> An: 'daniel mehrmann ping-net de' <daniel mehrmann ping-net de>
> Datum: Dienstag, 8. August 2000 07:50
> Betreff: LVM 2.2.16
> 
> 
> >
> >Hi,
> >I need LVM + Raid 0.90 on 2.2.16
> >Is it possible to use your patch? You say that we shouldn't 
> use it! Is it a
> >stability problem or a patching problem?
> >I patched 2.2.16 with RAID + LVM : 2 files were not patched 
> (rejected) but
> >it was easy to make it by hand
> >So, What's the problem with RAID + LVM?
> 
> 
> A patch and vars problem. The patch is stable ! Do you really 
> patch and
> compiled it ?  Does it run??
> If it true can you send me your 
> .../linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_block.c ?
> There should be a vars problem. (If it work of course there 
> are no problems
> :-))
> Thanks
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: ll_rw_blk.c
Description: Binary data


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]