[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and inactive snapshots.
- From: Jay Weber <jay lazy accessus net>
- To: linux-lvm sistina com
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and inactive snapshots.
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:10:05 -0600 (CST)
> No. The kernel should not unmount because this may cause
> confusion and possibly corruption of user mode information
> (eg. /etc/mtab).
>
> If a snapshot is dead the kernel could simply return an error
> (EIO?) for any access to the snapshot (which no longer exists).
> So the bahaviour would be well defined.
Ah, yes, this does seem more reasonable and does address the issue of the
bits that are left lying about.
>
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Marxmeier Marxmeier Software AG
> E-Mail: mike msede com Besenbruchstrasse 9
> Phone : +49 202 2431440 42285 Wuppertal, Germany
> Fax : +49 202 2431420 http://www.msede.com/
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm sistina com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]