[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] balance functionality
- From: Michael Marxmeier <mike msede com>
- To: linux-lvm msede com
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] balance functionality
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 18:42:41 +0200
Forwarded message from Matthew O'Keefe (okeefe borg umn edu) ...
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Matthew O'Keefe" <okeefe borg umn edu>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 07:37:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] balance functionality
Message-ID: <20000509073709 A96956 styx >
References: <20000505230812 A449 HAL HAL>
In-Reply-To: <20000505230812 A449 HAL HAL>
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 11:08:12PM -0400, Jean-Francois Landry wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I was wondering if the current LVM implementation supports functionality similar
> to the Digi^H^H^H^HCompaq Tru64 Unix "balance" utility. This utility rearranges
> data across volumes ( I think this maps to PV's in the Linux LVM) so that files
> are scattered evenly in a concatenated volume. Anyone willing to comment on
> that? Sorry if this has been covered but I was unable to find anything in the
> mailing lists archives.
Hi,
I don't think so. Since the volume manager only knows about blocks,
not files, it cannot make decisions about how blocks for a particular
file should be distributed. RAID-0 striping can help in general with
this
problem. Our Linux cluster file system (GFS -- see
www.globalfilesystem.org)
has a balancer, but it is out-of-date, as the balancer has not kept up
with our latest code updates. We plan to include this functionality
in the
future.
Matt O'Keefe
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Francois Landry
> --
> I'm famous. Ain't taht a bitch!
> Thelonious Sphere Monk
> --
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]