Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM 2.2 snapshot bug

["Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct redhat com>]

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:36:06PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Andreas writes:
> It would probably be a lot better to simply change ext3 to handle the
> "proper snapshot" stuff that is in ReiserFS, so that at the time of the
> snapshot, the journal is flushed and the RECOVER flag is removed from
> the superblock (and returned afterwards).

Right --- that's easy to do, but it doesn't mean that it's OK to lie
about the ro_bits!

Cheers,
 Stephen