[linux-lvm] What have snapshots got to do with LVM ?
Heinz J. Mauelshagen
Mauelshagen at sistina.com
Tue Apr 24 13:50:37 UTC 2001
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:05:56PM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:27:48PM +0000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > You said it already above: the general concept still needs to deal with chunks
> > which could eventually map to LVM PEs in case we run LV snapshots carying
> > metadata (COW table sections) and data.
> > The abstraction therefore will be one in notion basically
> > (chunk rather than PE).
>
> I'm certain this is the way to go for 1.2, having thought about it for
> a day. Snapshot's would still be part of the LVM suit, but just
> implemented in a seperate driver.
>
> The only problem is the per device hook. Has anyone else implemented
> something similar ?
Didn't see something in public so far :(
> or shall I just have a bash and upset the gurus.
Yes!
The typical "we need to suffer in order to make things better" thing.
>
> - Joe Thornber
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen at Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list