On Fri, Aug 17 '01 at 11:43, Joe Thornber wrote:
> > --- pv_release_pe.c.old Thu Aug 16 09:23:35 2001
> > +++ pv_release_pe.c Wed Aug 15 09:09:06 2001
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
> > }
> > pe_index = ( vg->lv[l]->lv_current_pe[p].pe -
> > LVM_VGDA_SIZE ( vg->pv[pv_num]) / SECTOR_SIZE) /
> > - vg->pe_size;
> > + vg->pe_size - 1;
> > debug ( "pv_release_pe -- pv_name: %s pe: %lu sector: %lu\n",
> > vg->pv[pv_num]->pv_name,
> > pe_index,
>
> This patch looks wrong, I cant see why anyone would want to divide by
> pe_size - 1, if it's working it's by accident.
Disclamer: I did not lok at the code, and don't know what I?m talking
about ...
But, what this patch does, is devide by pe_size and substract 1 from the
result.
--
Goetz Bock IT Consultant
Dipl.-Inf. Univ.
Attachment:
pgp00018.pgp
Description: PGP signature