RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL

["Chemolli Francesco (USI)" <ChemolliF GruppoCredit it>]

> However, considering there was almost a fork of the project (mostly)
> because of something as "simple" as mailing list policy, i guess
> openLVM would pop up again pretty quickly in that case...   Is it
> concievable that the kernel patches will stay GPL'ed but a more
> restrictive license applied to the userspace tools ?

This is what happens with the GFS too: the kernel patches remain GPL'ed.

-- 
	/kinkie