No, I am not using devfs. Yes, I ran 'vgscan -d'. Indeed, I meant to attach the associated log (unless it was stripped by the list software). I'll try again. Also, I misreported the version number. It was 0.9.1beta1 under which this occured. On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:11:43PM +0000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote: > > Charles, is this under devfs? > Side remark: you probably run "vgscan -d", right? > > Didn't get the attachement, sorry. Send it again please. > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:36:00PM -0800, Charles Duffy wrote: > > Howdy. I'm experiencing some difficulties while transitioning from LVM > > 0.8i to 0.9. > > > > vgscan reports: > > > > vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV": can't > > get data of volume group "vg01" from physical volume(s) > > > > When I try to recieve more info (by running vgscan with "-D"), I > > recieve a segfault. > > > > This appears to be happening inside pv_read_uuidlist, at the memset on > > line 91 (I added some extra debug() calls to determine this). The > > attached log (from the original, unpatched version) should help by > > giving some context. > > > > Frankly, I don't know why this is happening -- more than sufficient > > space appears to be allocated beforehand -- but, as long as one rules > > out a bug in debug(), I don't see any other way 'round it. > > > > Thanks for your help.
Attachment:
lvmlog.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Attachment:
pgp00009.pgp
Description: PGP signature