[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write
- From: Juan Quintela <quintela mandrakesoft com>
- To: Chris Wedgwood <cw f00f org>
- Cc: John Alvord <jalvo mbay net>,Daniel Phillips <phillips bonn-fries net>,Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>,Andrew Morton <andrewm uow edu au>,Andreas Dilger <adilger turbolinux com>,"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan cs uml edu>,Ben LaHaise <bcrl redhat com>,Ragnar Kjxrstad <kernel ragnark vestdata no>,linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, linux-kernel vger kernel org,mike bigstorage com, kevin bigstorage com, linux-lvm sistina com
- Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write
- Date: 16 Jul 2001 20:31:57 -0400
>>>>> "chris" == Chris Wedgwood <cw f00f org> writes:
chris> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:05:36PM -0700, John Alvord wrote:
chris> In the IBM solution to this (1977-78, VM/CMS) the critical data was
chris> written at the begining and the end of the block. If the two data items
chris> didn't match then the block was rejected.
chris> Neat.
chris> Simple and effective. Presumably you can also checksum the block, and
chris> check that.
There is the rumor (I can't confirm that), that you need checksums,
that some disks are able to write well the beginning & the end of the
sector and put garbage in the middle in the case of problems. I
have never been able to reproduce that errors, but ....
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]