[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] Migrating to an LVM system (boot/root) disk
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <lvm interlinx bc ca>
- To: linux-lvm sistina com
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Migrating to an LVM system (boot/root) disk
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:04:53 -0700
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:40:20PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> That's because LVM 0.9.1b7 is broken w.r.t. LILO.
Ahhh. Now that makes sense. :-)
> You must have a very strange system if your IDE drive will be known as
> /dev/sda1 (maybe IDE-SCSI)?
Oops. I am a SCSI-head. I don't normally use IDE but I am giving
ATA66 a whirl on my workstation. Because of my predominant use of
SCSI /dev/sd* is what I am used to dealing with. Of course I meant
/dev/hda1 rather than /dev/sda1
> In any case, yes I think that this will
> screw up your boot sector. What you can try is the "disk=" parameter
> in your lilo.conf, saying /dev/hdc has BIOS number 0x80, so that when
> you shuffle your disks the boot sector will be correct.
It's not so much the boot sector I am worried about. What concerns me
is that when I set up my new disk (on /dev/hdc1) with LVM, LVM is
associating the device /dev/hdc1 with the PV. What happens to that
association when I move the disk to the primary ide bus and it becomes
/dev/hda1?
> I put a (non-LVM) rescue boot partition on my disk which has basically
> everything from /bin, /sbin, and some /lib/lib*, /lib/modules/<kernel>.
Everything that is needed for LVM you mean or do you mean you copied
everything from your root filesystem? If the latter, would that not
be overkill?
But I like the idea. I was thinking it was time to move on from
emergency boot diskette(s) to a boot CD-ROM.
> Cheers, Andreas
Thanx Andreas,
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]