[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
- From: Russell Coker <russell coker com au>
- To: linux-lvm sistina com, Steven Lembark <lembark wrkhors com>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:28:36 +0200
On Friday 08 June 2001 00:23, Steven Lembark wrote:
> > Proportionally, how much slower is it? 50%? 25%? 12%?
> > less than 1% slower?
> > Does it really matter?
>
> For things like /, /tmp or primary swap even a few % can
> make a difference (especially on newer drives that use
> variable sector allocation). This is something the system
> hits frequently with quite a bit of data.
However if you use two partitions at opposite ends of the drive then the
seek times will kill performance...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]