[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
- From: Russell Coker <russell coker com au>
- To: linux-lvm sistina com, "Steve Wray" <steve wray the net nz>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 04:26:20 +0200
On Thursday 07 June 2001 23:52, Steve Wray wrote:
> > From: linux-lvm-admin sistina com
> > [mailto:linux-lvm-admin sistina com]On Behalf Of Steven Lembark
> >
> > > Tell me, what is wrong with having /tmp as a mount point
> > > for a LV?
> >
> > LV are generally slower than other types of storage. Since the
> > boot partition is generally cyl 0 it's on the fastest storage
> > available (short of tmpfs).
>
> Proportionally, how much slower is it? 50%? 25%? 12%?
> less than 1% slower?
> Does it really matter?
See my Bonnie++ web page, particularly the ZCAV part. The graph shows
the start of the disk being ~80% faster than the end. Try it out on your
own drives!
This isn't an LVM issue, it's a disk geometry layout issue.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]