[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [OT] List concerns and dieas (was Re: [linux-lvm] next step of recovering from tha vgchange problem)



Hello,

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:18:11PM +0100, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Leave this on. Most mails are to be mailed to the list anyway. It's
> annoying if you'd alway needed to use the reply-to-all feature of your
> mail client and then delete the original sender address to keep the
> mail on the list and not sending the original sender two mails. I'm

In my opinion, an annoying mail client is not reason to break the 'reply'
function for people with sensible clients.

> [X] KEEP the reply-to-header

I strongly oppose reply-to munging.

Greetings,

Mark.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]