[linux-lvm] More Segfaults with LVM 1.0.1rc3
Heinz J . Mauelshagen
mauelshagen at sistina.com
Mon Oct 8 10:02:07 UTC 2001
Nile,
thanks for the info.
Does LVM compiled under gcc-3.0.1 *without* optimization work?
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:18:26PM +0000, Nils Juergens wrote:
> On Fri, 05.10.01, svetljo <galia at st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> >
> > Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:25:56AM +0200, svetljo wrote:
> > >
> > >>is gcc-3.0.1 safe, or i should also use "-o0"
> > >>
> > >
> > >Don't have a report for this :-(
> > >Please try it.
> > >
> > it's seems to work
> >
>
> I tried gcc-3.0.1 with LVM on linux-2.4.10 and had a lot of problems,
> but it was no problem in LVM, it works with 2.95.4.
>
> What i was seeing was funny stuff happening to the stack after
> a function call causing (in my case) lvremove to segfault.
> I have seen this with gcc-3.0.1 before, on another program.
>
>
> Nils
>
> --
> > Nils Juergens | nils at muon.de | icq 7090774 <
> > If we all work hard, we can turn this company <
> > around 360 degrees -- gruntbert(LOTD) <
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen at Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list