Re: [linux-lvm] SoftRaid and LVM

[svetljo <galia st-peter stw uni-erlangen de>]

what do you mean that my problem is off topic

and could you possible didn't noticed that all the post come from me

i've got only 2 or 3 replies and i realy need help

Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:

> I don't understand what you mean!
> Your request is offtopic. You ask for help on a thread not related to
> you...
> But on the thread there :
> <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/2001-September/008611.html
>
> > you already got help from many!
>
> What do you mean and want exactly???
> -jec
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: svetljo [mailto:galia st-peter stw uni-erlangen de] 
> > Sent: mardi, 4. septembre 2001 17:03
> > To: linux-lvm sistina com
> > Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] SoftRaid and LVM
> >
> >
> > Hei why does nobody try to help me
> >
> > [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 
> > reiserfs?) 
> > <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/2001-September/0
> 08611.html>
>
> i've done pretty much trys and almost nobody seems to wont to help me am
> i invisable
>
> svetljo
>
> Ray Miller wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:35:40PM +0200, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > It seems that you use a fresh 2.4.9 kernel. In kernel 2.4.9, the 
> > > version of LVM is 0.9.0-beta2, which is what you get with dmesg or cat
>
> > > /proc/lvm Then you installed tools from 1.0.1rc2. You must upgrade 
> > > your kernel with LVM 1.0.1rc2 if you want all that to be consistent 
> > > (or use beta2 tools, which is not the good way IMHO).
> > >
> > > Recompile 2.4.9 with LVM-1.0.1rc2 and you'll be OK.
> > I applied the 1.0.1-rc2 patch to a clean 2.4.9 kernel tree and was able
>
> > to create a logical volume on top of s/w RAID 1 without any trouble. 
> > However, a bonnie++ run on an ext2 (or ext3) filesystem on the logical 
> > volume caused the system to lock up, with kswapd going uninterruptible.
>
> > I suspect a VM (rather than LVM) problem, as a similar lock-up occurred
>
> > on another system with 2.4.8 kernel and no LVM. We've reverted to 
> > kernel 2.4.7 on both systems and had no problems since.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm sistina com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm sistina com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html