[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs



http://otn.oracle.com/oramag/webcolumns/2002/techarticles/scalzo_linux02.htm
l

you will probably have to join otn to be able to read the article, but i'm
not sure.

reiserfs appears to work really well for lots of small files, but performs
relatively poorly on a few really large files (ie database).  in terms of
performance oracle ranks them thusly

ext2
ibm-jfs
ext3
reiser

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Schiltknecht [mailto:markus bluegap ch]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 9:26 PM
> To: linux-lvm sistina com
> Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
> 
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:14, Little, Chris wrote:
> > It also depends on your workload.  If you are serving a 
> large database,
> > reiser (the last i heard) is probably a bad choice.
> 
> why is that? thought reiser was faster than ext3 while ext3 would be
> considered more stable (in general).
> 
> Before getting ways off topic: where can I find a good comparison /
> discussion on different filesystems?
> 
> Thanks for your suggestions
> 
> Markus
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm sistina com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]