[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
- From: Spam <spam tnonline net>
- To: Matt <linux-lvm sistina com>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
- Date: Mon Dec 8 10:16:02 2003
>> > So, if your drive gets bad blocks, you can very quickly be rebuilding
>> > your entire filesystem ( I lost a TB on a RAID where one drive developed
>> > some bad blocks.)
>>
>> You must have been running RAID0, otherwise one drive wouldn't matter.
>>
>> > Just keep in mind stability.
>>
>> I'm removing harddrives with bad blocks immediately - and running RAID5.
>>
>> I'm definitively not missing that feature ;-)
> I was running RAID5.
Then a bad drive should not matter or you have done something wrong.
RAID5 has redundancy for one drive so you should not loose any data.
But agreed. Bad blocks management is a needed feature of any
filesystem. Just as defragment support utils.
From what I understood is Reiser4 going to improve on all areas.
Performance wise no FS should be very slow on big files? Or what did I
miss?
> Matt sChillinger
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]