[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] lvm2 and xfs (repost)



On Friday 06 June 2003 04:25 pm, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> why not go for a recent -ac kernel and skip patching :)
> ( in -ac are included both xfs and dm )
>
> and someone posted a dm-patch against xfs kernel on the list

I played with 2.4.20 + xfs + vfs lock + lvm2, plus some patches I made to 
output snapshot usage in 512-byte increments.  While the patches don't 
apply, per se, it's mostly because patch isn't smart enough to notice the 
code moving around.  I think there were like 1 or 2 .reg files, with 
maybe two trivial fixes each.  So merging manually isn't bad, e.g. if you 
don't want any of the other -ac changes.

-- 
GPG: 03EE 9EB8 E500 874A F509  7B95 9B9A 84A1 26E9 4F79
http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~jhs/public_key.gpg

Attachment: pgp00001.pgp
Description: signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]