[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queuedepth, nr_requests)
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm osdl org>
- To: Nick Piggin <piggin cyberone com au>
- Cc: miquels cistron nl, axboe suse de, linux-lvm sistina com, linux-kernel vger kernel org, thornber redhat com
- Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queuedepth, nr_requests)
- Date: Thu Feb 19 20:25:01 2004
Nick Piggin <piggin cyberone com au> wrote:
>
> Even with this patch, it might still be a good idea to allow
> pdflush to disregard the limits...
Has it been confirmed that pdflush is blocking in get_request_wait()? I
guess that can happen very occasionally because we don't bother with any
locking around there but if it's happening a lot then something is bust.
- References:
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- [linux-lvm] [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth,nr_requests)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]