[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 snapshot not quiesced by LVM2?

From: Joe Thornber <thornber redhat com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm redhat com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 snapshot not quiesced by LVM2?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:12:30 +0000

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Donald Murray P.Eng. wrote:
> Does anyone have any theories why our LVM2 snapshots have orphaned inodes?

Yes, it's because the VFS lock patch isn't wired up correctly in the
version of dm that you're using - it's quiescing the wrong device.

You could try my _unstable_ dm tree if you wish to experiment.

people.sistina.com/~thornber/dm

- Joe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 snapshot not quiesced by LVM2?
  - From: Donald Murray P.Eng.

References:
- [linux-lvm] EXT3 snapshot not quiesced by LVM2?
  - From: Donald Murray P.Eng.
- Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 snapshot not quiesced by LVM2?
  - From: Donald Murray P.Eng.

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]