[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] Which size for snapshot volume for a *safe* backup?
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk redhat com>
- To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Which size for snapshot volume for a *safe* backup?
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 01:10:17 +0000
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:39:11PM +0100, Marc-Jano Knopp wrote:
> So, obviously,
> snapshot volume size = original volume size
> is not sufficient to hold a complete change of the original volume.
Correct - there's a little bit of metadata required too to
map each piece of data back into the right location.
> Btw.: There's a bug in "lvscan", it still displayed the snapshot
> as being "ACTIVE", while in fact (at least that's what I concluded),
> it was "INACTIVE" due to the lack of space, as shown using "lvdisplay".
The 'lvs' attributes should be accurate (and lvdisplay too I think).
lvscan doesn't check properly and needs fixing, thanks.
Alasdair
--
agk redhat com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]