[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
- From: Luca Berra <bluca comedia it>
- To: dm-devel redhat com, ataraid-list redhat com, linux-lvm redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:57:50 +0200
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
I agree with moving the partition detection code to user space, but
trying to undo it after the fact doesn't help because udev is already
processing the add events. Also you do not need to remove the
partitions so long as pvscan understands that it shouldn't be using them.
which is the modification i proposed to lvm tools, isn't it?
Udev is supposed to be the new model for enumerating devices and
i know that, and i will withdraw from this discussion, since it might
get to an useless flame war.
Is there any technical reason for not having lvm tools filter out devices that
are used by device mapper?
besides dmraid, think of multipath.
Regards,
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca comedia it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]