[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] Inconsistent VG
- From: "Bryn M. Reeves" <breeves redhat com>
- To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Inconsistent VG
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:21:52 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
C'est Pierre wrote:
> Does someone have any guesses?
> Aside from that, we've checked from the lvm/archive/vgdw2_* files. The
> recent-most, doesn't include lvol4. We've managed to pull the "lvol4 {
> }" part from an older file and confirmed all pv's in the segment
> definitions existed in the destination, but it didn't help either.
You need to find a version of the metadata that's consistent & contains
the LV that has gone "missing", then restore that using vgcfgrestore.
You should also probably look at the metadata backups for lines that
begin "description = ", as these contain the command that was run at the
time the archive was created. If your LV disappeared at some point in
the past there is a good chance this will tell you when & why.
Regards,
Bryn.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHX/yQ6YSQoMYUY94RAvdEAJ97ITMjN9hFbzRWLMTc2DG0SfNzuACfW3MC
lTlIEpTQZgM4NcS978osQLM=
=oF9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]