[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] LVM limits?
- From: "Ehud Karni" <ehud unix mvs co il>
- To: linux-lvm redhat com
- Cc: linux-lvm redhat com
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM limits?
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:04:35 +0200
I think this is quiet off topic, so this is my last reply.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:27:13 Chris Cox wrote:
>
> Let's say you want to make a copy of your 5TB filesystem... how long
> does that take?
>
> My point (washed away in silly talk) is that operations on large
> filesytems can take a VERY long time. Just looking at the (very)
> trivial examples and not looking that the problem at a whole doesn't
> solve the problem (as much as we'd like to think that it does).
I agree to your basic point, but what is your solution ?
Even if you have distributed FSs, you still have to back it all,
keep its integrity and manage it somehow. I don't see how it is
a lesser problem.
The basic problem is that the data we hold grows faster than the
software/hardware capabilities (or they are unreasonably priced).
Ehud.
--
Ehud Karni Tel: +972-3-7966-561 /"\
Mivtach - Simon Fax: +972-3-7966-667 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Insurance agencies (USA) voice mail and X Against HTML Mail
http://www.mvs.co.il FAX: 1-815-5509341 / \
GnuPG: 98EA398D <http://www.keyserver.net/> Better Safe Than Sorry
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]