On 2009-07-21 05:35, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:41:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:Debian Sid's 2.02.44-3 returns a non-zero code, so either RH fixed it upstream, or Debian patched it...# vgs /dev/sdc1 WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config node: filter (seeking filter) Volume group "sdc1" not found # echo $? 5That's a *different* error case that works correctly. Yes, I agree that the original case mentioned should give EINVALID_CMD_LINE instead of ECMD_PROCESSED.
> On 2009-07-21 02:16, Masanari Iida wrote: > # vgs /dev/cciss/c0d3p3 > Invalid volume group name: cciss/c0d3p3 Hey, you're right!! But why? (I tried to mimic his example as best I could.)Is it because of the multi-level device name, and the parser getting confused?
-- Scooty Puff, Sr The Doom-Bringer