[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-lvm] fsync() and LVM
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd commandprompt com>
- To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] fsync() and LVM
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:33:23 -0700
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 15:51 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > The point of fsync() is for an application to know that a write has been
> > safely committed, as for example sendmail would do before acknowledging
> > to the sender that a message has been accepted. The question isn't
> > whether an application can call fsync() but rather whether it's return
> > status is lying, making the underlying storage unsuitable for anything
> > that needs reliability.
>
> Right and for databases this is critical. So enlightenment here would be
> good.
Anyone?
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake jabber postgresql org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]