2012-February Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
- [linux-lvm] avgrq-sz maxes out at 1024 for lvm devices,
John Anthony
- [linux-lvm] [Linux-lvm] Need help in understanding the logical to physical mapping by LVM,
Anuj Goel
- [linux-lvm] Question for LVM feasibility and usage on the embedded linux,
박준모
- [linux-lvm] mirror_region_size default: 4096 six times faster than 512?,
Ray Morris
- [linux-lvm] Duplicate PV's - how does LVM choose which one to use,
Danilo Godec
- [linux-lvm] Strange behavior adding LUN,
Stuart Browne
- [linux-lvm] DM / LVM hangs if snapshot present on kernel v3.0.3,
Spelic
- [linux-lvm] fsadm bug,
Oliver Mangold
- [linux-lvm] Allocation Policy for Cloud Computing needed,
Sebastian Riemer
- [linux-lvm] Snapshots,
Mark Woodward
- [linux-lvm] LVM locked on md raid with removed disks,
Peter Davies
- Re: [linux-lvm] new to cLVM - some principal questions,
Lentes, Bernd
- [linux-lvm] lvmconvert --merge fails to remove devices on rebbot,
Dusty Mabe
- Re: [linux-lvm] New LVM2 release 2.02.89: Thinly-provisioned logical volumes,
Busby.Cheung